Friday, June 2, 2017

Trump Reality TV: Paris Climate Exit 4 years Away- Meaningless Withdrawal Claims

Since I'm not a disciple of Cult AGW, the entire fraud surrounding & including all these accords could go away and I'd be quite happy. 

Got up this morning to a chilly 7 degrees Celsius/44 Fahrenheit- June 02/2017

Can't put my garden in because it's too cold and damp- For the first time ever, in 25 years of gardening, we covered our garden in black fabric to try and draw some heat into the soil

Where is all that AGW we were told would occur?

It was obvious that Trump, being both the psy0p and distraction, would never take the US out of this globalist engineered accord. Sure enough- He didn't.

 Certainly the distracting fake news media is aware of this. And yet I see literally reams of coverage regarding this non news

Including numerous buildings lit up in green for all the money extracted and profits made for what has to be the biggest of big lies- Ever

The media does it's duty, promoting the reality show I call "Trump under the Big Top" 

Green with Envy







 And this claim via the BBC?
The UN World Meteorological Organisation said on Friday that, in the worst scenario, the US pullout could add 0.3C to global temperatures by the end of the century.
3/10ths of  of a degree Celsius by centuries end. Maybe. So in 83 years worst case scenario  is maybe one third of one degree Celsius? Based on what factors? What's the best case scenario? This is pie in the sky type stuff. It's absurd.

I'm going to make a prediction for 83 years down the road that is a valid as the Useless Nations claim- An asteroid is going to hit the planet, catastrophic damage will be done. It's going to get even colder then it is getting now and those who remain on the planet will be praying for that extra 3/10ths of ONE degree Celsius. They will make offers to the bloated golden cow effigies representing David Rockefeller and Al Gore- To save the planet (Cause they said they would) But the offering will be in vain- If not an asteroid- then a super volcano will blow and block out the sun.

 James Lovelock regretted his claims

Lovelock takes back his climate prediction- Cause it was as worthless as the UN's absurd prediction
“We were supposed to be halfway toward a frying world now,” Dr Lovelock reflects. “The world has not warmed up very much since the millennium. Twelve years is a reasonable time. It [the temperature] has stayed almost constant, whereas it should have been rising - carbon dioxide is rising, no question about that.
 The problem is we don’t know what the climate is doing. We thought we knew 20 years ago. That led to some alarmist books – mine included – because it looked clear-cut, but it hasn’t happened."
 Lovelock wrote ..  The Independent in 2006, he wrote, "before this century is over, billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable."
From a worst case scenario of one third of one degree temperature increase there will be a few breeding pairs of people left in the Arctic??????

Over the top. Pie in the Sky. That was 11 years ago. That is an outrageous claim. He lost all credibility for his many outrageous claims. 

Instead of questioning the many,  the multitudinous, absurd claims made by the AGW shills the reverence for this cracked bunch of pottery continues.

About the fraud that is Trump's claim- He fits in well with the likes of Lovelock

Trump pulling out of climate agreement... In 4 years

 The good news: he can’t just pull the plug. Under the terms of the agreement, it’ll take four full years to officially exit, which means the next President can put a stop to this nonsense in 2020.

“In order to fulfil my solemn duty to protect America and its citizens, the United States will withdraw from the Paris Climate Accord,” Trump told a handpicked Rose Garden crowd of staffers and climate deniers. “But begin negotiations to reenter the Paris accord or an entirely new transaction on terms that are favourable to the United States, its businesses, its workers, its workers, its taxpayers. So we’re getting out. But we will start to renegotiate, and we’ll see if we can make a deal that is fair. And if we can, that’s great. And if we can’t, that’s fine.”
He is, of course, wrong on all those counts.
  • US businesses had urged Trump to stay IN the Paris agreement
  • US workers overwhelmingly favor staying IN
  • US taxpayers aren’t going to save a dime, especially once the cost of dealing with climate change is factored in (estimated in the TRILLIONS)
Since the Paris Climate Agreement is already a voluntary association with benchmark goals staggered over the next 20+ years, and since the Prexit Process is formal and takes four years, “withdrawing” this afternoon is essentially meaningless.

11 comments:

  1. "...“withdrawing” this afternoon is essentially meaningless."...

    Penny, have you noticed? All contemporary International Agreements, no matter what the topic, are "meaningless". The US and its Western "allies" are not capable of commitment..or responsibility for this planet or any of its inhabitants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. GC he didn't withdraw from the accord.
      I think you may have missed that?
      Unless I'm misunderstanding your comment?

      He has in fact kept the US in this globalist accord
      He has lied to his supporters yet again.
      The US will go nowhere for 4 years
      Trump has kicked the can down the road and that's it
      Apparently he is quite capable of supporting elitist agendas that have nothing to do with the stewardship of this planet

      Expecting an increase in warfare in Syria...
      To be distracted by the globaloney about AGW

      Delete
  2. Penny, Trump's posturing on the Paris Climate Agreement is a great boost for the many Global City movements that are in the process of usurping National Sovereignity.

    "Regardless of President Trump’s decision, the great cities of the world, in particular the 12 American C40 cities, remain resolutely committed to doing what needs to be done to implement the Paris Agreement." - Anne Hidalgo Mayor of Paris and Chair of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group
    http://www.newsweek.com/anne-hidalgo-paris-agreement-climate-change-donald-trump-619309

    "Mayors could override Trump on the Paris climate accord — here's how"
    http://www.businessinsider.com/mayors-could-override-trump-on-paris-accord-2016-11

    "Cities will lead on climate change even if the federal government doesn't."
    https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-11-22/washington-won-t-have-last-word-on-climate-change

    "Many US mayors have said they will abide by climate commitments regardless of the White House U-turn. This was echoed by municipal leaders overseas."
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/01/trump-withdraw-paris-climate-deal-world-leaders-react

    "“Cities will be a powerful antidote to Donald Trump”: Social scientist Benjamin Barber on the emergence of a new urban radicalism"
    https://qz.com/837383/cities-will-be-a-powerful-antidote-to-donald-trump-social-scientist-benjamin-barber-on-the-emergence-of-a-new-urban-radicalism/

    C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group-
    http://www.c40.org/

    "The Global Parliament of Mayors is a governance body of, by and for mayors from all continents."
    https://globalparliamentofmayors.org/

    The Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy-
    http://www.globalcovenantofmayors.org/

    Smart Cities-
    http://www.smartcityexpo.com/en

    Strong Cities-
    http://strongcitiesnetwork.org

    Safe Cities-
    https://safecities.net.au

    Sanctuary Cities-
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary_city
    https://cityofsanctuary.org/
    http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/features/how-sanctuary-cities-are-plotting-to-resist-trump-w453239

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. hey gimlet eye!
      all the links put this in the spam file
      but no worries, I rescued it

      I saw that about the cities- montreal being one of them- so these cities are willing to undermine the nation state for the global government tyranny?
      That's the impression I get from that?
      Is this correct, in your opinion, cause that's what it looks like in mine!

      Trump really is playing this distractionary role

      btw: Montreal is also a so called sanctuary city

      I shall read some of the links- thanks!
      And if you wish to expand on your thoughts please do..

      Delete
    3. Thanks for those links GE. I see Portland, OR, where I live has all four of its "badges" - so fully on board!

      Delete
    4. choo choo global tyranny here we come.
      If only more people would realize that :(

      Delete
  3. I normally keep out of discussions regarding this subject because the question is never framed properly. You cannot come up with the correct answer to a question based on a false premise.

    I live fairly near the Gulf Of Mexico in the Southeastern United States and I have watched the weather here becoming increasingly CHAOTIC in recent years. I have also seen low lying offshore islands being submerged by the rising ocean. These are observable facts on the ground.
    I have identified a total of five forces at play here:
    (1) Weather naturally goes threw cycles of heating and cooling.
    (2) Sunspot activity affects the weather.
    (3) Seismic activity affects the weather.
    (4) CO2 emissions from human activity affect the weather.
    (5) There is a program on the part of at least the American Government to CONTROL the weather.

    These five factors in a dynamic relationship with each other are what is creating our chaotic weather.

    As for the latest episode of the Trump circus involving the question. It is absolutely IRRELEVANT and a DISTRACTIUON as you said. The real problem is not being dealt with one way or the other.

    Furthermore, also as you said, it is used to distract people away from other, actually more immediately pressing news.

    It is the same people who stand to benefit on both accounts and the same people that will suffer for it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Randall the "climate change" psyop is complex, for sure- It's multi faceted and has a ton of layers

      Gimlet eye is addressing one, in that it allows the smart mega cities to circumvent the national government and go it alone- in preparation for the outing of the global government- where the nation state will be but a quaint memory
      It is the original spin, the original meme (mind virus) that I use, and with which this psyop was created.

      The rebrand of man made global warming (AGW) to climate change indicates a change in sales pitch when one concept/brand was an obvious fail

      This psyop was first introduced as Anthropogenic Global Warming- man made gases causing catastrophic global warming-

      The premise is once created - needed so called science support it- It is a giant appeal to authority

      The aims of the IPCC are to assess scientific information relevant to:[6]

      Human-induced climate change,
      The impacts of human-induced climate change,

      When everything is a nail (human caused) all that is needed is the IPCC hammer

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPCC_First_Assessment_Report

      The first report was created in 1990- it is now 27 years old and time has shown it to be false

      I'm quoting from the report

      "Our judgement is that: global mean surface air temperature has increased by 0.3 to 0.6 oC over the last 100 years...; The size of this warming is broadly consistent with predictions of climate models, but it is also of the same magnitude as natural climate variability"

      So the earth has warmed 3/10ths to 6/10ths of one degree celsius and this

      "it is also of the same magnitude as natural climate variability"

      Stated clearly they had no real reason to promote the man made cause because the temperature variability fit within natural climate variability

      The UN had an agenda, they created the IPCC and it's pre-approved conclusion and the did a hard sell using science and fear and the big lie to promote it.

      Regarding the sun:

      the IPCC didn't address the sun until many reports later and only dismissively- this is absurd to even contemplate because if the sun was not here- there would be no life what so ever on this planet

      The sun is the largest factor for warming or cooling on the planet (barring a massive asteroid hit or super volcano explosion)

      Delete
  4. Its actually global temp adverging. Here on island in Atlantic its cold. Does not mean adverage temp is not up, just warmer winter and colder summer, shorter growing season. Im the off grid guy and this stuff matters, i have got people and dogs need eating. Nothing grows here now outside greenhouse. Season to short.
    Further the political and 1 world govt is to be funded by carbon tax. Do you think these people care if you freeze and starve?
    Were just leaving a sun spot max into a sun spot min. Like in the 1700s when it was cold. Thats just a fact of history, you can look it up. Why is it so cold?
    Fact is global warming supports good vegatable growth and large aninimal population, unlike ice.
    However if you have 3 core meltdowns melting the ice by overheating the Pacific then water rises. But inland still can freeze out the crops.
    But carbon tax is to support the new and upcoming one world govt its above the current govt and requires a new tax, carbon tax is it.
    People sit there freezing while going along with global warming.
    Further the whole time 20 min reserch on sun max and min answeres the whole thing.
    I dont think any of this is funny I have a family to feed and the Doberman gang, all eat from crops we cant grow because of cold

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Off the grid guy: Hello! This stuff does matter. I agree. And when we don't have food, those that our set to profit from the carbon tax (in more ways then monetarily), will not care.

      "I dont think any of this is funny I have a family to feed and the Doberman gang, all eat from crops we cant grow because of cold"

      and it isn't funny at all.
      To my understanding the Atlantic is colder.. making the eastern coastline colder also

      http://theconversation.com/the-atlantic-is-entering-a-cool-phase-that-will-change-the-worlds-weather-42497

      "Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation”


      Here in the Great Lakes region it has been colder for years- consistently.. This last winter was rather average temp wise, but, it was long, long, long

      The three winters prior were extremely cold. Extremely cold

      Here it is june 04 we are two weeks past the traditional planting time and it's still cool

      We covered the garden to draw heat in this past week- in hopes of both warming and drying it
      (no greenhouse)

      Roto tilled the garden and planted two rows of cool tolerant plants including our heirloom tomatoes

      No peppers, no eggplant, no cucumbers, no genovese basil (these like warm and it's not warm enough)

      we had plants outside (south facing porch) noticed the pepper leaves had cold damage from overnight temps dipping into the mid '40's F- this is about 7 Celsius- in June. We are just two weeks away from summer- and already the growing season has shortened by two weeks- if the first frost comes too soon- we will loose some of our garden

      we did last year- we lost beans to killing frost way to early

      cold is ignored to push the agenda but you are right cold is much worse for everyone then heat

      At one time the area I live in was covered with 2 miles thick of ice....

      Delete

TROLLS &SPAM WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT HESITATION
KEEP IT RELEVANT. NO PERSONAL ATTACKS